Home>Products>35x72x34 bearing>35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm Loyal F214101-1 angular contact ball bearings
Loyal F214101-1 MODELS
Need a CAD or 3D Model?
35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm Loyal F214101-1 angular contact ball bearings
35x72x34 bearing
Loyal F214101-1 Bearing SPECIFICATIONS
35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm Loyal F214101-1 angular contact ball bearings manufacturer and global supplier of reliable ball 18000 rpm Oil Speed Rating n2 and roller ... 35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm Loyal F214101-1 angular contact ball bearings Industries Products Manufacturing & Engineering and Agricultural 35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm Bearings designed to meet BROWNING BEARINGS MANUFACTURE LIMITED the unique requirements of our targeted industries.
- Loyal
F214101-1
- 12700 N
- 10000 rpm
- 18000 rpm
- 15000 rpm
- 20.000 mm
- 6550 N
- 18000 rpm
- 15000 rpm
-
BROWNING BEARINGS MANUFACTURE LIMITED2020-07-10 09:46:19
Welcome to my shop! Glad to serve you! Please send your question!
35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm Loyal F214101-1 angular contact ball bearingsCode description
- 12700 N
- 10000 rpm
- 18000 rpm
- 15000 rpm
- 20.000 mm
- 6550 N
- 18000 rpm
- 15000 rpm
- 14.00 mm
- 1.00 mm
- 35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm
Loyal F214101-1 Details of35 mm x 72 mm x 34 mm Loyal F214101-1 angular contact ball bearings
Loyal F214101-1 bearing Size Chart (mm/inches) | |
---|---|
Bearing number | 031BC07A2 |
Dimensione (mm) | 30.6x72x19 |
Marchio | NACHI |
Diametro del foro (mm) | 30,6 |
Diametro esterno (mm) | 72 |
Larghezza (mm) | 19 |
d | 30,6 mm |
D | 72 mm |
B | 19 mm |
C | 19 mm |
Loyal F214101-1 INTERCHANGE
35x72x34 bearing Part series F214101-1 is a potential replacement for these common bearing part numbers:
F214101-1
F214101-1
F214101-1
F214101-1
F214101-1
F214101-1
F214101-1
F214101-1
Contact Us

- BROWNING BEARINGS MANUFACTURE LIMITED
- AddressEmilio Cardenas No.Apdo., Tlalnepantla, Edo.de México,
- Phone(Working Time)+52-85-5399-1168
- Fax
Loyal F214101-1 Technical Articles
How do I know if my thrust bearing is bad? |
How do you diagnose wheel bearings? |
How do you know if a one way bearing is bad? |